lmplement of a decision writing homework help

Stakeholders to the decision were identified and discussed accurately but could be more comprehensively or clearer with more relevant information.  

(1.92 – 2.159)

Stakeholders to the decision were identified and discussed but needsmore clarification on some aspects. 

(1.68 – 1.919)

Stakeholders to the decision were identified and discussed but does not fit the facts provided, inaccurate statements are made or key points missing.

(1.44 – 1.679)

Stakeholders are not discussed.

(0 – 1.439)

All of the business consequences to the decision (example: keeping production going, costs of down time, costs of moving machines etc.) were explained and additional business concerns discussed accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.

(2.43 – 2.7)

All of the business consequences to the decision (example: keeping production going, costs of down time, costs of moving machines etc.) were explained and additional business concerns discussed sufficiently but is not consistently accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.

(2.16 – 2.429)

All of the business consequences to the decision (example: keeping production going, costs of down time, costs of moving machines etc.) were explained and additional business concerns discussed but needs more clarification on some aspects. 

(1.89 – 2.159)

All of the business consequences to the decision (example: keeping production going, costs of down time, costs of moving machines etc.) were explained and additional business concerns discussed management is presented in a superficial manner or is missing key points.

(1.62 – 1.889)

Business consequences to the decision is not discussed.

(0 – 1.619)

Discussed complete plan (from beginning to end) as to how the move might work given and consequences of implementation is discussed clearly, accurately, and  comprehensively presented delivering all relevant information.

(2.43 -2.7)

Discussed complete plan (from beginning to end) as to how the move might work given and consequences of implementation is discussed sufficiently but could be more accurate and comprehensive with more relevant information.

(2.16 – 2.429)

Discussed several ideas as to how the move might work given consequences of implementation/ could clarify some aspects.

(1.89 – 2.159)

Mentioned some ideas as to how the move might work given consequences of implementation.

(1.62 – 1.889)

Implementation Plan not discussed.

(0 – 1.619)

All of the steps needed to create change that the company must do to make move possible were identified and discussed  clearly, accurately, and  comprehensively presented delivering all relevant information.  Communication specifically  addressed.

(2.43 – 2.7)

All of the steps needed to create change that the company must do to make move possible identified and discussed sufficiently but could be more accurate or comprehensive with more relevant or specific information.

(2.16 – 2.429)

Most of the steps needed to create change that the company must do to make move possible identified and discussed.  Some points may need clarification.

(1.89 – 2.159)

Mentioned some of the steps needed to create change that the company must do to make move possible/Key points missing.

(1.62 – 1.889)

Failed to identify the steps needed to create change that the company must do to make move possible.

(0 – 1.619)

Concepts and ideas are fully developed. Thinking is consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/provides solid assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and reasoning.

(5.4 – 6)

Concepts and ideas are developed. Thinking is mostly consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/ provides good assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and reasoning. 

(4.8 – 5.39 )

Concepts and ideas are mostly developed but may need clarification on some aspects of thinking, reasoning or evaluation. Conclusions are drawn. Reader follows the author’s logic but occasionally there are areas that are unclear.

(4.2 – 4.79)

Concepts and ideas are not cohesive.   Misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates, justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions. At times, the reader must attempt to determine the author’s train of thought. 

  (3.6 – 4.19)

Concepts and ideas are not fully developed or presented in a cohesive manner. Misinterprets questions or material.

(0 – 3.59)

Arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts.

(5.4 – 6)

Arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate understanding of the material and concepts.

(4.8 -5.39)

Arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material.

(4.2 – 4.79)

Arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; Limited use of facts in case study and essential information presented in resources; May resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material.

(3.6 – 4.19)  

Arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas. Does not provide facts presented in case study.

(0 – 3.59)

demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment

(2.7 – 3)

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

(2.4 – 2.69)

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

(2.1 – 2.39)

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

(1.8 -2. 09)

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

(0 – 1.79)

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  No errors found.  No jargon used.

(2.7 – 3)

Adheres to standard usage of mechanics:  conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  One to three errors found.

(2.4 -2.69)

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  Four to 10 errors found.

(2.1 – 2.39)

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  More than 10 errors found.

(1.8 – 2.09)

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of written English largely incomprehensible and errors are too plentiful to count.

(0 – 1.79)

No APA style errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper. Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(1.35 – 1.5)

Attempts in-text citations and reference list but one or two APA style errors noted.

(1.2 – 1.349)

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted; inconsistencies in citation usage are noted throughout document.

(1.05 – 1.19)

Attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.

(0.9 – 1.049)

No attempt at APA style.

(0 – 0.89)