Was your classmate’s reasoning articulate and logical? Were the facts correct?, HR 3.3 discussion help

Hello! Please Create discussion response for the attached write-up and be write as if you were reviewing his or her posting in an academic journal. Your discussion response should therefore answer the following questions as applicable:

    1. Was your classmate’s reasoning articulate and logical? Were the facts correct?
    2. Was the interpretation your classmate provided reasonable and consistent with experts in the field? Did your classmate defend the choices effectively?
  1. The focus for your critical analysis is not whether or not you agree with your classmate, but how well his or her position was presented.

  2. Each response should be 250-300 words in length and is to include a minimum of two sources properly cited and referenced: (a) the Strategic Compensation textbook, and (b) an academic journal article (selected from the above listing) that is at least 3-5 pages in length and published within the last 3-5 years.

Please respond to LydiaF response referencing this article https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/c…

Please respond to TWood response referencing this article https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/compensation/Pages/CustomerSatisfaction.aspx

Thanks!

Attached are the write-up’s, articles listed above in bold and list of acceptable HR journals.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.