5 pg APA ethic interview

DIRECTIONS:You will write an APA 7th Edition paper, 5-7 double-spaced pages in length, on someone of your choosing who is currently in an executive position or in a leadership role. They should be considered a C-Level (CEO, CIO, CFO, etc.) executive or in a prominent leadership position.  At a minimum this person needs to be responsible for a significant function in an organization and have supervisory responsibility over others.  The interview may be conducted on the phone, virtually, or in person (your methodology or mode of conducting the interview, must be documented in your paper).  This paper must include a minimum of five (5) peer-reviewed, refereed journal articles pertaining to your subject’s ethics. As a guideline, your paper should include:DESCRIBE: A description of the subject’s ethical beliefs and practices. In two pages (approximately) you should address the following: What challenges have they encountered in the workplace that have shaped their views on ethics? How have they addressed those challenges (their ethical reasoning)?ANALYZE: An analysis of the subject’s ethics.  How did he or she evolve their view of ethics?What ethical theories are expressed or implied in his or her discussion of ethics.  Examine whether there were inconsistencies, deficiencies, inadequacies in his or her ethical theory. If there were no shortcomings, account for the strength of the subject’s ethical position. What motivated the leaders to act appropriately or inappropriately, in your opinion? This should be approximately two-three pages.SYNTHESIZE and EVALUATE: Do you agree with your subject’s approach to ethics? If not, why not, and if so, then why?  What did you learn from this interview and your research?  About two pages are adequate for this portion.You are to summarize and analyze the content of the interview, not provide a verbatim transcript of the interview. This is due on Sunday of Week Six, and is worth 300 points. The grading rubric for this paper is provided in Course Information in Blackboard.Signature AssignmentExecutive Interview RubricCriteriaExemplaryProficientNeeds ImprovementBelow ExpectationsNo creditContent Accuracy80Provides clearidentificationof the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Utilizing the course textbook or journal articles identify two or more ethical theorists or theories to explain the leader’s approach.73Provides fairly clearidentificationof the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Utilizing the course textbook or journal articles identify two or more ethical theorists or theories to explain the leader’s approach.67Provides somewhat clearidentificationof the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Utilizing the course textbook or journal articles identify one ethical theorist or theory to explain the leader’s approach.61Does not provide a clearidentificationof the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Does not utilize the course textbook or any journal articles, and does not identify any ethical theorists or theories to explain the leader’s approach.0Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted.Critical Analysis80In-depth discussion of three (3) of the following:Inadequacies, deficiencies, or inconsistencies in the subject’s ethicsStrengths of the subject’s ethicsPresents evidence corroborating your position of the subject ethical behaviorUtilizes the textbook and journal article(s) to state your case.73In-depth discussion of two (2) of the following:Inadequacies, deficiencies, or inconsistencies in the subject’s ethicsStrengths of the subject’s ethicsPresents evidence corroborating your position of the subject ethical behaviorUtilizes the textbook and journal article(s) to state your case.67In-depth discussion of one (1) of the following:Inadequacies, deficiencies, or inconsistencies in the subject’s ethicsStrengths of the subject’s ethicsPresents evidence corroborating your position of the subject ethical behaviorUtilizes the textbook and journal article(s) to state your case.61Does not discuss any of the following:Inadequacies, deficiencies, or inconsistencies in the subject’s ethicsStrengths of the subject’s ethicsPresents evidence corroborating your position of the subject ethical behaviorDoes not utilize the textbook and/or journal article(s) to state your case.0Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted.Application/Learning60The writer provides a clear and detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics.   Identifies a minimum of 3 learnings from the interview.53The writer provides a somewhat clear and somewhat detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics.   Identifies 2 learnings from the interview.47The writer provides an inadequate and minimally detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics.   Identifies 1 learning from the interview.41The writer does not provide a clear or detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics.   Does not identify learnings from the interview.0Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted.Writing Mechanics and APA40The writer clearly demonstrates an understanding of the assignment while using a style, form and language that is appropriate for a college level paper. The writer properly acknowledges the work of others by consistently utilizing current APA style.33The writer demonstrates some understanding of the assignment while using a style, form and language that is appropriate for a college level paper.The writer properly acknowledges the work of others with some APA flaws.27The writer demonstrates minimal understanding of the assignment while using a style, form and language that is appropriate for a college level paper. The writer properly acknowledges the work of others with major APA flaws.21The writer uses a style, form, and language that are not college level quality.The writer does not acknowledge the work of others, and does not utilize APA style.0Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted.Use of Sources40The writer has used at least 5 scholarly reference sources. Draws from primary sources for discussion.33The writer has used at least 5 scholarly reference sources. Draws heavily upon secondary sources for discussion.27The writer has used at least 5 scholarly reference sources. Draws heavily upon secondary sources for discussion.21The writer has used 4 or fewer scholarly sources of reference.0Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.