comparing food markets part 2 writing the report 1

AcademicWritersDen.com boasts a team of highly skilled and experienced writers who specialize in various academic fields. The company carefully selects its writers through a rigorous screening process to ensure that they possess the necessary qualifications and expertise. Whether it’s an essay, research paper, or any other homework assignment, students can rely on AcademicWritersDen.com to connect them with professionals who have an in-depth understanding of the subject matter. This ensures that the work delivered is of high quality and meets the academic standards set by educational institutions.

Assemble final written report (Approximately 1200-1500 words)

Before you sit down to write your paper, you may first want to spend some time pondering what you think we can learn sociologically about our local community — and the way it is impacted by globalization — from this comparison of these different grocery in our region.

In this final report you will be assembling information from the previous three steps of the assignment into a single, narrative description of your research project. The report should begin with a summary section where you describe what you observed and identify the ways that the two food markets are both similar and different from one another. In the next section you should interpret your observations and try to link your observations to relevant sociological concepts that we have learned about throughout the course.

Your final report should be labeled and organized in the following format:

• Summary: Provide a detailed description of each location referencing the guiding questions provided in Step 2 of the assignment. Use your field notes to support your descriptions. Limit this section to observable phenomena – things that you saw during your visit.
• Social/Neighborhood Context: For each location provide information about the social context. Where is this store located? Who does it serve? Use the data/information you gathered in Step 3 of this assignment to describe important aspects of the surrounding neighborhood and its inhabitants, i.e., their racial/ethnic breakdown, the foreign-born population, the median annual income, etc.

Rubric

Food market comparison rubric

Food market comparison rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Field notes Evidence that student followed instructions and took detailed field notes following observations in the two markets.	10.0 pts Field notes are attached and show solid detailed descriptions of observations. 8.0 pts Field notes are attached. These deserves more elaboration, may be little more than bullet points. 6.0 pts Some evidence that field notes were taken. But these are not attached or explicitly referenced in the paper. 0.0 pts No evidence that field notes were taken.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary Detailed description and summary of observations in the two markets.	20.0 pts Detailed summary of observation from both markets. Addresses various aspects of the observations, from physical layout of the store and products displayed to the cars in the parking lot. 16.0 pts Contains solid summary of observations, but this may be lacking in detail or focus on only a few of the relevant aspects of the stores. 12.0 pts Does summarize the observations, but is severely limited, lacking in real details, and/or missing crucial elements. 0.0 pts Summary is (nearly) non-existent.	20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Interpretation Student strives to interpret what s/he saw in the two stores AND uses sociological concepts to do so.	20.0 pts Student provides solid, even creative, interpretation of her/his observation. Well-chosen concepts learned this semester are used to make sense of observations. 16.0 pts Decent interpretation is provided. May use some sociological concepts, but these may not be the most appropriate or useful to make sense of observations. 12.0 pts Interpretation is provided, but this is very limited. May not even draw upon meaningful sociological concepts learned this semester. 0.0 pts Interpretation is severely lacking or missing entirely.	20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Social context	20.0 pts Makes some effort to describe/discuss the social context by drawing upon relevant data from Census Bureau, Racial Dot Map, or similar source. 10.0 pts Tries to describe the social context to understand the area, but does not use relevant data from reputable sources. 0.0 pts No discussion of social context.	20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion	10.0 pts Offers a strong conclusion and links this to the evidence and observations presented in the paper. 7.0 pts Decent conclusion provided, but may not link directly to evidence or observations 0.0 pts No conclusion provided.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing mechanics and style	10.0 pts Clear communication with few if any grammatical or mechanical errors. 8.0 pts May contain some writing errors but these do not impede successful communication. 6.0 pts Contains significant writing problems that make it difficult to comprehend the writer’s point of view or arguments.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citation practices	10.0 pts Correctly cites sources using ASA style. 5.0 pts Makes some effort to cite sources, but does not accurately use ASA style 0.0 pts Needed citations are absent	10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.