Critical thinking about age discrimination article

  1. Critically evaluate the article:
    • In roughly 300 words argue why the points set forth in the article point to discrimination against older workers in the labor market.
    • In roughly 300 words argue why the points set forth in the statement do NOT point to discrimination against older workers in the labor market. Draw some reasoning from at least one paper discussed in class to support your reasoning.
    • As part of your evaluation above don’t forget to mention whether the evidence presented points to taste or statistical discrimination, or whether the article neglects to draw a difference. Do not forget to cite paper in the text and also in a bibliography.
  2. Critically evaluate any one of the following policy ideas (roughly 300 words) to help reduce discrimination against older workers. Cite at least 1 paper discussed in class as part of your evaluation. • Banning employers from asking about age in job applications. • Banning exclusionary advertising (the article mentions this in the context of the complaint against Facebook’s policy of allowing employers to target job wanted adds to certain groups).

Please answer EVERY question strictly in 900 words.

MLA citation..

The article which need to be analyzed is in the back of ‘Final writing assignment’ document.

The other 4 papers are part of papers discussed in class, I think they could be useful for citation.

‘Mackey’ is about litigation.

‘Tuskegee and health of black men’ focused on old black men.

‘Murphy’s How Gary Becker saw the scourge of discrimination’ is about taste discrimination.

‘Moro Statistical Discrimination’ is about statistical discrimination.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.